WebSep 29, 2024 · In 2008 the Publishing Research Consortium conducted a survey in which more than 3000 academics were asked a series of questions about peer review. One of the clearest messages to emerge from the survey was a lack of support for single-blind peer review: 56% of respondents reported a preference for double-blind peer review, with just … WebOct 26, 2024 · CAMBRIDGE, England, Oct. 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- eLife is pleased to announce a major change in editorial practice. Building on its 2024 shift to exclusively …
eLife - the journal on Twitter
Web14 hours ago · We conduct behavioral experiments across a comprehensive range of light and temperature cycles and find that Nematostella's circadian behavior is disrupted by chronic misalignment between light and temperature, which involves disruption of the endogenous clock itself rather than a simple masking effect. WebJan 18, 2024 · However, if our editors decide a paper is not appropriate for eLife, we will allow authors to postpone the posting of the public review until the paper is published … terminal 3 lhr map
科学网—发表文章是一次长征 - 黄旭的博文
WebApr 30, 2013 · One of the founding principles of eLife has been to assign authority for the editorial decisions to scientists who are still active in the research community. Although the same is true of many journals, particularly those run by scientific societies, eLife has introduced a number of innovations into the peer review process to ensure that editorial … WebIt took eLife 35 days to come to an editorial decision. Some problem had them contacting me on day 16, telling me that there had been delays. They apologized and told me a … WebTot. handling time acc. manuscripts. 2.6 months. Decision time immediate rejection. 10 days. Average number of review rounds. 1.7 rounds. Difficulty of reviewer comments. 3.0 / 5.0 (moderate) Average number of review reports. terminal 3 kedatangan